ALL you libs that have your noses up Obama's behind, need to step back, and breath some fresh air…..and put down the kool-aid. Those of you that are able to read and differentiate..need to study something besides Obama-laced websites. And just take a look at those Obama sites, they are full of Socialist ideas and Bush bashing cartoons to no end.
Obama himself admits it in his own writings, his wife's writings back it up, as well as the multitude of unscrupulous supporters that have funneled and laundered money throughout his campaign. If you truly care about your future, and the future of your children, or this country…you'll step back, and evaluate Obama's ideas and proposals and see that they are nothing short of poison for the economy of this country. Bush ran up the tab, but kept us safe. Obama's stepping on the gas and running up the debt exponentially, apologizing to our enemies, and taking away your rights….all simultaneously. Open your eyes, shut your mouths, and read for yourselves…it's not a Republican v. Democratic issue, it's the livelihood of the nation, a free nation, that's at stake…Obama only cares about power and control…and once you give it to him, it's too late…he's on his own agenda to create a state where he can do, and take whatever he pleases from whomever; and soon he'll turn on his very supporters….to feed the need.
And don't tell me for one second to give this CREEP a chance! A chance to do what? He' has already just about given the country away and bankrupt us. And you are asking me to give him a chance to further destroy us?
How often did democrats support Bush's policies? He was president right? Did the Libs EVER give him a chance or even a break? No, never. What kind of Socialism do you prefer? Germany's, France's, Russia's, the Netherlands, Sweden's, Canada's are any of them any good? Not in my eyes. It's so obvious Obama is a socialist. I just don't understand why people don't want to see it! His plan it to Tax thr Rich and Screw the Poor.
Yes, Change' in the air alright, I can smell it wherever I go. We've seen it fail in Eastern Europe few years ago and now he's bringing it here?
Obama said Republicans can't just "listen to Rush Limbaugh" and get things done. And then he truns around and he suggested his administration would talk to the moderate elements of the Taliban — as in the terrorists masquerading as a government. Regardless of whether this is a good idea, we have a president who is now willing to sit down with violent extremists under the guise of "getting things done." Hummmm!
We DON'T NEED THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLING OUR LIVES. You left wing idiot nut jobs. I am just waiting for 2010 I know you are all going to be tossed out on your stupid asses.
It isn't just Obama,it is liberals overall, who feel we are just too selfish,greedy,stupid, or it is just not fair to while fairer to others.
ReplyDeleteIn other words,they hate capitalism.
Good point Scalawag.
ReplyDeleteAnd GREAT blog Mr. Rant
Great blog Ranter, check out the one I did today, I think you will like it.
ReplyDeleteWe DON'T NEED THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLING OUR LIVES. ..amen my friend!!!
ReplyDeleteI support my president. I love the "Bush kept us safe" mantra. His presidency apparently started 9/12/01. 9/11 happened DURING his presidency. Remember???
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
ReplyDelete"I support my president. I love the "Bush kept us safe" mantra. His presidency apparently started 9/12/01. 9/11 happened DURING his presidency. Remember???"
Look Anonymous, (and I love these "hit and run people called Anonymous)
Yes, I "remember"
Do YOU remember this?
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
CLINTON DIDN'T DO A THING! BUT BUSH TOOK CARE OF IT!
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five US military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
CLINTON DIDN'T DO A THING! BUT BUSH TOOK CARE OF IT!
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which Killed 19 and injured 200 US military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
CLINTON DIDN'T DO A THING! BUT BUSH TOOK CARE OF IT!
After the 1998 bombing of US embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
CLINTON DIDN'T DO A THING! BUT BUSH TOOK CARE OF IT!
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 US sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
CLINTON DIDN'T DO A THING! BUT BUSH TOOK CARE OF IT!
Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 3,016 people in New York and Washington, DC that are now dead would be alive today.
BUSH TOLD THOSE FIREMAN -- THEY WOULD HEAR US TOO! And, now that Bush is taking action to bring these people to justice, we have opponents charging him with being a war monger...
INTERESTING ?
Any more questions Mr. or Ms. Anonymous?
August 6, 2001 daily briefing: Bin Laden determined to strike US.
ReplyDeleteSo you are saying Clinton didn't do anything about Bin Laden so why should Bush have bothered? Good reasoning.
The fact of the matter is that the Bush administration ignored hard evidence from its top intelligence officials between April and September of 2001 about an impending attack by al-Qaeda on US soil. There's no chance that the National Security Agency's domestic wiretapping initiative would have saved the lives of 3,000 American citizens if an intelligence memo titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside US" that President Bush received a month before 9/11 couldn't move Bush to take such threats seriously.
ReplyDeleteSince the New York Times broke the domestic spying story last month, the Bush administration has launched a full-scale publicity campaign aimed at convincing an unsuspecting public that the program is legal and has saved thousands of lives. It's the administration's attempt to control the news cycle.
But to suggest that the 9/11 attacks could have been avoided if the NSA had had domestic surveillance powers is outrageous.
Simply put, terrorism was not a priority for the Bush administration during the first nine months of 2001. As former Bush administration counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke told the 9/11 Commission investigating the attacks in 2004: "To the loved ones of the victims of 9/11, to them who are here in the room, to those who are watching on television, your government failed you."
Clarke served as a White House counter-terrorism official in three presidential administrations.
The truth is that the administration received warnings about al-Qaeda's intentions to use jetliners as bombs in August 2001, but it was too busy obsessing about a war with Iraq to take action. Although President Bush has maintained over the years that terrorism was his number one priority before 9/11, evidence suggests otherwise.
A little known article in the January 11, 2001, edition of the New York Times titled "Iraq Is Focal Point as Bush Meets with Joint Chiefs" confirms that the administration was more interested in toppling Saddam Hussein than dealing with the growing threat of domestic terrorism.
"George W. Bush, the nation's commander in chief to be, went to the Pentagon today for a top-secret session with the Joint Chiefs of Staff to review hot spots around the world where he might have to send American forces into harm's way," the Times story says.
Bush was joined at the Pentagon meeting by Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.
The Times reported that "half of the 75-minute meeting focused on a discussion about Iraq and the Persian Gulf, two participants said. Iraq was the first topic briefed because 'it's the most visible and most risky area Mr. Bush will confront after he takes office, one senior officer said.'"
"Iraqi policy is very much on his mind," one senior Pentagon official told the Times. "Saddam was clearly a discussion point."
INTERESTING??
ReplyDeleteNo MORON, I never said that at all,
ReplyDeleteWhy am I bothering to argue with a MORON?
I mus be crazy myself.
Why don't you go to a Lib blog where you will be welcomed and understood?
Love the rant. Pretty much sums up everything!
ReplyDeleteAnonymous - Pity you spend all your time defending and tarnishing old Presidents. I noticed you offered no defense for the current one. You better start paying attention to current events before the rulers in your party turn this country into the horror you spent last 8 years fearing.
Hindsight is ALWAYS 20/20, folks. And taking a shot @ people who did everything they knew to do at the time is pretty cheap.
ReplyDeleteFacts remain that several Presidents (Rep. & Dem.) neglected to take terrorists seriously until we finally HAD to (9-11). Fact remains that our Gov't DID fail us for years - until one President had the wherewithall to actually do something about it (i.e., Bush). Would he have done it w/o 9-11? Who knows. Was he backed into a corner? Sure. Did our Gov't want it to happen, or participate in it? Oh Please, save it for conspiracy nuts...GWB was simply the Office of President at the time that something HAD to be done. I, for one, believe that him being our President at that very time was nothing short of the Providence of God. (Call me crazy, I don't care. I'm studying the book of Esther, so sue me...) He was God's man in that position "for such a time as this" & did what he had to do.
Now we all must do what we have to do... and if that means speak out against a destructive, Left Wing, Socialist turn of our own Gov't, then so be it. I'm in.
This is laughable. You blame Clinton for 9/11 and then faced with irrefutable evidence to the contrary, you tell me I'M tarnishing old presidents. You guys crack me up.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous - Actually, I don't recall blaming anyone. What I did was tell you that you were wasting your time arguing about old presidents (Clinton and Bush). There's no end when a past President is blamed for issues that occur with the current one. If you don't believe me, please pay attention to my next paragraph.
ReplyDeleteYou see, no matter how true your statement may be, you cannot logically come to the conclusion that you've come up with. Let me illustrate with the last time something like 9/11 occurred, Pearl Harbor. There was all kinds of intelligence that would have shown that Pearl was about to be bombed. Now following your logic, since FDR didn't follow it, he did a poor job protecting the nation for the first part of his presidency (which happens to be about 8 years). You see it must be so, because he was so worried about that whole depression thing that he failed the country by not seeing the Japanese threat. Furthermore, the internment of the Japanese would never have prevented the bombings in the first place. Hey, I can probably super impose this in your words.
Your comments edited to fit the times.
"The fact of the matter is that the Roosevelt administration ignored hard evidence from its top intelligence officials for weeks, days, and hours up to the impending attack by the Japanese on US soil. There's no chance that the FBI's internment of Japanese American's would've saved the lives of roughly 3,700 American citizens if intelligence sent by the Navy regarding Japanese movements, that President Roosevelt received, prior to Pearl Harbor couldn't move Roosevelt to take such threats seriously."
I'm sure we can find the examples repeated through history.
It is a shame you think logic laughable. What is sorry is that you are commenting on a post that is calling into question the current president of the United States. Instead of defending your current party leader, you're waste your time arguing over Bush, who is now irrelevant. One must ask, do you have the logic to win the debate regarding the current president? If you do, I applaud you and welcome you into the realm of relevance.
Bush may have been plotting global domination. If he was, he didn't succeed and as a bonus, it has nothing to do with anything going on today. I suggest you save all your research for a conservative post about why Bush should not be investigated. Then it would start making sense and I would not be telling you, that you are wasting your time. Better yet, please continue with your indictments of Bush, it will do your party a lot of good in 1210 and 1212 elections .
Ronald Reagan said it best.
ReplyDeleteThe nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'
Anonymous, you tell US what you think Bush should have done....ground every airplane in America for...how many years, or??? I'm always curious to see the answer to that one.
ReplyDeleteof course, when and if (probably when) we get hit on Obama's watch, he'll have had nothing to bring it on because he's been so caring, so kind, so logical and reasonable. Hey, Russia turned him down on his offer for putting in a good word to Iran if we'll take down those pesky missile defense systems that keep us safe, and the 'moderate Taliban' said NO when we hoped they'd put in the good word with the real mean ones...How's obama working for you so far? And how's it feel that the media's not really talked about those abysmal failures of THE ONE's GREAT PLANS?
Hey, Rant..Nice blog, thanks for coming by geeeeZ
Great Post !
ReplyDeletehey, saw you over at jules blog. i don't know much about you yet, but if you're dissin on the obamessiah then i'm sure i'll like it over here.
ReplyDeletegreat rant, check mine out @ http://rightsidereview.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeleteWhat a bunch of complete effing morons all of you are! I mean all of you except for the Anonymous commenter who challenged your idiocy.
ReplyDeleteBush deserves imprisonment for life for war crimes against humanity. That loser is the one who destroyed our economy by allowing for unfettered regulation, which DOES NOT WORK. He didn't give a shit about the American people; all he cared about was helping his rich friends get richer.
Cheny obviously sold his soul to the devil...he will get his in hell, I expect.
As for all of you dipshits who voted for them (and I could see how you might have been fooled once, the first time he ran, but the second? There is no excuse for that!), you owe, in my opinion, the USA reparation money plus at least eight years of community service.
Get started cleaning up the huge mess you brough upon our once-great nation.